ASSESS
Authorized penetration testing and vulnerability assessment
Understand exposure and validate what the evidence actually shows.TRANSITION / LOADING
Preparing the next reviewable route and its evidence boundary.
Public boundary. This transition does not request credentials, payment details, or private incident evidence.
>_ NODE 00 / IRELAND / SOURCE FIRST
Authorized defensive cybersecurity for public-sector programs, defense suppliers, essential services, and regulated-technology teams—turning penetration testing, vulnerability, risk, due-diligence, and recovery questions into evidence and next action.
FIRST MOVE Choose the decision route that fits the question, then bring the high-level objective, authority owner, and desired outcome.
// DEFENSIVE CYBER / RESILIENCE
ZeroDev helps public-sector programs, defense suppliers, essential services, and regulated-technology teams turn authorized security evidence into safer decisions, stronger controls, and tested recovery.
Authority and evidence first. Scope, written authority, information handling, limitations, and owner decisions remain explicit before technical activity begins.
Authorized penetration testing and vulnerability assessment
Understand exposure and validate what the evidence actually shows.Risk management, due diligence, and compliance readiness
Give owners and procurement a defensible treatment and evidence path.Disaster recovery, BCP, and incident readiness
Keep critical services moving through tested decisions and known dependencies.// START WITH THE DECISION
Do not begin with a product label. Begin with the decision your team needs to make, then follow the smallest evidence path that can support it.
Start with an authorized test or a verified view of assets, weaknesses, and remediation priorities.
Start with risk, technical, supplier, or readiness evidence that an owner can explain and act on.
Start with critical-service priorities, dependencies, recovery assumptions, and an exercise or restore condition.
Start with roles, escalation, communications, evidence boundaries, and a bounded readiness exercise.
// CHOOSE BY DECISION OWNER
Use the audience you represent as a second route signal. Review the qualification context or prepare a role-aware safe brief; neither action establishes a client relationship, contract, authority, or sector credential.
You need authority, procurement, and evidence handling visible before a decision.
You need controlled-information, supply-chain, and authorized testing boundaries in view.
You need a supplier evidence path with confidence, gaps, and an explicit next gate.
You need a bounded technical question, evidence source, and treatment path.
You need dependencies, recovery assumptions, and an exercise or restore condition.
// REGISTERED SURFACES
Each surface has a different job. Choose the route that matches the decision in front of you.
A read-only monitoring lane is recorded, but its current provider route is not yet reconciled.
External monitor / provenance pendingLimit: The historical provider hostname is withheld until source and route ownership are reconciled.
READ ONLYAn EU gateway to a transparent public-signal estimator for strategic risk coverage.
Public signals / source-linked evidenceLimit: Indicators do not confirm an attack against ZeroDev.
PUBLIC SIGNALSDeployable tools, architecture sprints, and private build support.
Build support / fixed-scope deliveryLimit: Payment, fulfilment, and provider state require separate review.
DELIVERY SURFACE// LIVE DEFCON SURFACE
A first-party preview of the DEFCON coordination topology, paired with public-source indicators and clear limits on what the data proves.
Open live EU map Canonical live route: zerodevllc.eu/defcon. Current evidence and source-linked readouts are presented through the public EU gateway.// DEFCON SIGNAL FUSION
Public-source indicators only. Known exploitation or advisory activity is not confirmation of an attack against ZeroDev.
Text alternative to the visual topology. Node labels describe this interface; event rows link to the original public advisory or catalogue entry.
| Node | Signal |
|---|---|
| NORTH AMERICA | CYAN |
| PACIFIC WATCH | VIOLET |
| EUROPE | GREEN |
| EU RESPONSE | GREEN |
| AFRICA | AMBER |
| ASIA / PACIFIC | CYAN |
| OCEANIA | VIOLET |
| Event | Severity | Source / observed |
|---|---|---|
| Awaiting source refresh. | ||
// TRUST / METHODOLOGY
Every useful signal has a chain behind it. ZeroDev makes that chain visible so a visitor can tell what came from a source, what the interface interpreted, and what still needs a human decision.
The feed links to CISA catalogues and advisories. It is a public indicator layer, not private telemetry, an incident declaration, or a security guarantee.
Observed timestamps describe the source item. Checked timestamps describe the latest request. Live, degraded, unavailable, stale, and empty states stay distinct.
A local build or preview proves the candidate can run here. It does not prove source reconciliation, deployment approval, public acceptance, or provider configuration.
This .com candidate has no account, payment, or write workflow. It exposes public readouts and bounded refresh only; keep credentials, customer records, payment data, and sensitive incident evidence out of ordinary email.
For a suspected vulnerability, use hello@zerodevllc.com with the affected revision, reproduction, impact, and proposed mitigation. Do not publish credentials, private hosting configuration, or customer data.
Security policy: report a concern privately ↗. This route is for coordinated reporting, not a substitute for incident response or public authority.
// OPERATING APPROACH
Useful software keeps evidence, state, and next action in the same frame. That is how a surface earns trust.
Prepare a safe first briefKeep the evidence, status, and next action close to the output so important decisions stay inspectable.
Build browser-native surfaces that are responsive, resilient, and useful where the work actually happens.
Every interface should make the next move clearer: inspect, verify, export, or deploy.
// DEFENSIVE DELIVERY / REVIEWABLE OUTPUT
Bring the security question, supplier decision, recovery concern, or evidence surface that needs to become clearer. The work stays authorized, bounded, source-aware, and reviewable.
Start with the safe brief View security and resilience catalogueTurn the hard edge case into a bounded outcome and a route that someone can actually use.
Make source, ownership, states, privacy boundaries, and release evidence visible before the build gets noisy.
Shape the interface, integration, or internal tool around the decision it needs to support.
Check responsive behavior, accessibility, security controls, source links, error paths, and handoff evidence.
Leave behind a reviewable candidate, clear limitations, and an explicit list of owner-gated next actions.
// NEXT MOVE
Have a security, supplier, recovery, or resilience question that needs a defensible next step? Bring the high-level objective and the owner who can confirm authority.